Hushicho's Hidden Shrine

A repository for art, musings, rantings, and unabashed sentimentality by creator Hushicho, author of Incubus Tales.

Official site: http://hushicho.captainn.net

Yes, I do accept commissions! In fact, I welcome them! So if you want to commission me, go here and take a look! You can email me through the site or send me a message here! <3

This may contain items for mature audiences only! Proceed at your own discretion.
~ Monday, February 18 ~
Permalink

Okay I apparently missed the meteoric rise of some people’s stupidity while I was fighting off the flu, but let me just clarify something here I’ve been seeing here and there:

It is not bigotry for people to petition DC Comics to dismiss Orson Scott Card due to his extreme homophobia and bigotry.

Read More

Tags: dc comics boycott bigotry orson scott card
1 note
~ Monday, November 26 ~
Permalink
deviously-dangerous:

stfuconservatives:

autumnyte:


(Rebloggable version of this reply, per request.)
Well, here’s the deal, anon. The Salvation Army is an evangelical Christian group, and they impose those beliefs on the people that they employ and the communities they serve. Here are a few examples:
They are so opposed to LGBT rights that they have lobbied multiple times for exemptions from Federal and Local anti-discrimination laws, and threatened to withdraw their services. 
They refused to provide shelter to a homeless gay couple, unless they broke up and renounced their homosexuality. 
They refused to provide a transgender woman with shelter that was congruent with her gender presentation, instead insisting she house with men. She chose instead to sleep on the sidewalk and died from the cold.  
Speaking of gender, there was also this charming incident where one of their hostels refused to open the door for a 17-year-old victim who had just been brutally raped (or even call the police for her) because that particular hostel had a strict “men only” policy.
Children who can’t prove their immigration status are turned away.
The organization also disposes of any Harry Potter or Twilight related donations (rather than giving them to other charities), because they claim the toys are “incompatible with the charity’s Christian beliefs”. 
During the Bush Administration (thanks to ‘faith-based initiatives’) they fired about 20 long-time employees (Jewish, Muslim, Hindu and Gay), simply for refusing to sign the organization’s statement of Christian belief.  
So, that—in a nutshell—is what’s wrong with it.


Winter is coming… and so are their buckets. Remember this when they’re bothering you for change.

This makes me sad.  

This is sad, but it needs to be spread. Don&#8217;t give them anything. There are much better organisations that can use your help. Always know where your money is going.

deviously-dangerous:

stfuconservatives:

autumnyte:

(Rebloggable version of this reply, per request.)

Well, here’s the deal, anon. The Salvation Army is an evangelical Christian group, and they impose those beliefs on the people that they employ and the communities they serve. Here are a few examples:

They are so opposed to LGBT rights that they have lobbied multiple times for exemptions from Federal and Local anti-discrimination laws, and threatened to withdraw their services. 

They refused to provide shelter to a homeless gay couple, unless they broke up and renounced their homosexuality. 

They refused to provide a transgender woman with shelter that was congruent with her gender presentation, instead insisting she house with men. She chose instead to sleep on the sidewalk and died from the cold.  

Speaking of gender, there was also this charming incident where one of their hostels refused to open the door for a 17-year-old victim who had just been brutally raped (or even call the police for her) because that particular hostel had a strict “men only” policy.

Children who can’t prove their immigration status are turned away.

The organization also disposes of any Harry Potter or Twilight related donations (rather than giving them to other charities), because they claim the toys are “incompatible with the charity’s Christian beliefs”. 

During the Bush Administration (thanks to ‘faith-based initiatives’) they fired about 20 long-time employees (Jewish, Muslim, Hindu and Gay), simply for refusing to sign the organization’s statement of Christian belief.  

So, that—in a nutshell—is what’s wrong with it.

Winter is coming… and so are their buckets. Remember this when they’re bothering you for change.

This makes me sad.  

This is sad, but it needs to be spread. Don’t give them anything. There are much better organisations that can use your help. Always know where your money is going.

Tags: salvation army bigotry evil
24,109 notes
reblogged via deviously-dangerous
~ Sunday, June 10 ~
Permalink

On Religion, Philosophy, and Relationships (or, They Hatin’)

Recently a post popped up on here that really pushed me over my limit of being quiet and just rolling my eyes occasionally at some of this nonsense, so I’m going to say something. You can feel free to ignore it as you like. I’m even putting it behind a cut, for the benefit of the sensitive (and, probably, the people this post is about will neglect to read it too).

Read More

Tags: religion spirituality god gods allah beliefs belief philosophy bigotry discrimination
9 notes
~ Monday, May 28 ~
Permalink

khrushchevs-shoe:

There are some white people who have experienced more violence, hate and oppression than people of color. There are cis people who have horrible lives and trans people who are absolutely fucking spoiled. Because privilege isn’t black and white and doesn’t always invalidate individual experience. Jesus christ.

Beautifully said. Also I am getting really tired of people constantly slinging the word ‘privilege’ around casually and trying to use it in a way not really meant for individuals. It’s a value judgement and gives an indication that not only are you jealous, but you’re trying in a passive-aggressive way to attack someone you assume has an opportunity you want, based on their superficial ethnicity or external gender identity. Which is pretty damned discriminatory.

It’s far better to see people as individuals and work with those who struggle every day towards equality of all people, rather than being more divisive because of things that don’t matter. If you’re going to resent someone, resent them for being an asshole or a horrible person. Don’t resent them or try to ‘get them back’ for something you’re assuming about them based on some quality you’d hate to be judged by yourself.

(Source: creepworm)

Tags: racism sexism discrimination bigotry WELL SAID
39 notes
reblogged via auramidnight
~ Wednesday, May 9 ~
Permalink

wickedclothes:

There’s already a Change.org petition against the passing of Amendment One, which banned same-sex marriage, civil unions, and domestic partnerships in North Carolina. These things actually tend to be pretty damn effective.

Let’s see what the power of Tumblr can do! I know there’s at least a million Tumblr users who are against this sort of harmful discrimination and bigotry.

Sign the petition and reblog to spread the word, please!

Tags: amendment one north carolina bigotry glbt lgbt glbtq lgbtq petition SIGN IT
11,764 notes
reblogged via deviously-dangerous
~ Tuesday, May 8 ~
Permalink Tags: amendment one voting north carolina discrimination bigotry women's rights civil rights submission
62 notes
reblogged via deviously-dangerous
~ Monday, April 16 ~
Permalink Tags: homophobia bigotry would be nice if people read things and thought about them before reposting
195,815 notes
reblogged via catgirlxlrg
~ Friday, March 2 ~
Permalink

Why We Must Fight

I know I post and reblog many petitions and things that aren’t directly related to my artwork, and I know some of you may question why. Maybe you think I overreact. Maybe you think it’s easy to dismiss so many causes and so many things like this.

But it’s not. Now more than ever, we all need to take a decisive stand every time we are attacked. And it is attacks. And the people attacking are every bit as energetic and often much more vitriolic. These are powerful people who are abusing their power, who can influence so many who refuse to think for themselves. By not saying or doing anything in return to assert ourselves, we are complicit to their judgements. We are essentially consenting by silence.

Every time we allow something to be done to us without saying or doing anything in protest or disagreement, that sends a message that they can do it again…and next time, they can try to take more, do more, pull off more. Yes, it’s a great deal of work to have to babysit public figures, celebrities, and most of all government. But yes, it’s also worth it. We can’t live like children; and adults are only larger children, playing more far-reaching games of pretend.

I know some people skitter away from any historical parallels or warnings, which I feel is a mistake on their part. But recently I was reading about one of my favourite times — the 1920s — and in an often-ignored city in terms of that time (for various reasons): Berlin.

And maybe it’s because I’m in a couple of neatly-classified groups that would have had me shipped off to be mass-murdered for the good of the race, but I find the message that history has left to be a horrifying one. No country was a hero in any war, least of all World War II. Every country did atrocious things, to their own people and others.

But what is most sobering is the fact that the 20s was one of the most permissive times in Berlin, and not five years after the next decade began, it became harshly oppressive. Hideous. Inhuman. And murderous. Groups who had enjoyed openness and acknowledgement were now pariahs, less than human, killed like nothing, made to disappear. People were encouraged to be divisive, which made it difficult for groups to stand against this treatment, gradual as it was. Some groups were singled out as scapegoats for things that were not and could not even logically have been their fault. And it’s the same then as it is now: groups are attacked in ways to divide them, and they are only unified in the oppression of others, then made to feel like it has benefited them somehow.

I’m not saying these things will happen exactly the same way they did then. But that is a potent lesson on allowing the ambitious to go too far with ridiculous claims. We have the tools now to make it more difficult for them to succeed with propaganda and backpedalling when they say something they regret or that is ill-considered. The world is smaller and more communicative. And it is through petitions and the like that we can band together and make our voices known, in great number, and let them know that no, it is not okay to abuse us, whether verbally or through the attempt at passage of oppressive laws.

There is a tremendous amount of fear on the parts of these people lashing out most vociferously, and ignorantly, and that is what has powered most politics of the past quarter-century: fear. Fear of the unknown. Which is most regrettable since all it takes is a little willingness to learn, to banish that fear. Ignorance, especially willful ignorance, generates fear.

So what I’m trying to say is, now is not the time to throw up one’s hands or to simply tune out these things, to say ‘it’s not that bad’. It is that bad. It only takes a few seconds to sign and repost these petitions. It only takes a few seconds to do something, to add your voice, and to say ‘that’s not okay’. And that is really enough in many cases. It’s more than what most have done up to now. We have this amazing, powerful tool at our fingertips. Let’s not neglect it.

I know I’ve gone into some pretty serious territory here, and I know some might laugh it off or say I’m exaggerating. I am not. The situation is not exactly the same, and it never will be. But it is a sobering fact that even the most liberated environment, even the most tolerant and permissive culture, can be turned into a harsh, hostile cesspit of hatred virtually overnight. We must be ever vigilant. We must never allow ourselves to become complacent.

This world is by and for us. When any of us is treated so poorly, made out to be a scapegoat for problems that are nothing to do with us, even driven to suicide…no matter what, we must stand up, put our feet down, and say ‘no’. We must send a clear message that it is not acceptable.

So I hope you will take the time to spread the word when I post or repost about these issues, petitions, and causes. They are important. And I would rather take a little time now to try and send a clear message that these things aren’t acceptable than to have to fight harder, later, to undo the damage that was caused by people being too complacent and accepting things they should never have allowed.

Please consider these things. The internet is an amazing treasure. Let’s not neglect its potent ability. And let’s also not deny our own potent ability, the ability to change the world, one voice at a time, to make it a better place for everyone.

Tags: internet petition censorship bigotry discrimination santorum nazi tolerance
5 notes
~ Wednesday, February 22 ~
Permalink

‘Reverse’ Bigotry?

auramidnight:

Every time I hear the term ‘reverse-racism’, ‘reverse-sexism’ and all the other ‘reverse-isms’ I die a little inside.

 ”Reverse” whateverism means none of it. Which would be nice. But when people use it like that, they imply that racism is specific towards blacks and sexism is specific towards women. An “ism” is not owned by one specific group that happens to experience it the most. 

What’s awful about this term, as my friend puts it : “Reverse racism implies there is a proper direction to racism” (which there isn’t. It shouldn’t exist in the first place.)

So anyone who uses it like that comes off as racist/sexist/whatever to me….and honestly, just plain stupid.   

That’s not to imply it doesn’t exist. A person sexist towards men is still sexist. Not reverse-sexist. 

Tags: racism sexism bigotry this is so true and i'm glad someone said it
7 notes
reblogged via auramidnight
~ Tuesday, January 10 ~
Permalink

Is it too much for people to think about what they say before they open their virtual mouths?

We are online. We should be beyond all of this nonsense I see popping up on my dashboard regularly. When we first meet someone online, we don’t have the qualities of their birth staring us in the face; instead, what we have is their personality, their writing ability, and most of all their minds. Why, then, should anyone online still espouse the hateful fear of and contempt for the ‘other’ that permeates offline society even today? Get over it. See past the things that appeal to your ignorance, and instead put it aside and appreciate someone for who they are.

It doesn’t matter what race you are. It doesn’t matter your gender or gender identification. Sexuality, political leaning, religion — it doesn’t matter. If you prejudge someone or exclude them because of inborn traits, you are as much a bigot as you are presuming to preach to others about, and I for one won’t have it. I’m going to start unfollowing and blocking with Tumblr Saviour. Tumblr people, over all else, should know far better than this, and I come to Tumblr to enjoy myself and relax, not to be reminded of stupid people and their asinine hang-ups.

Let me just lay this out as briefly as I’m able, because I see these assumptions all over the place:

Just because someone shares a social trait or two with someone you identify as a criminal, hatemonger, heretic, power holder, oppressor, or any other negative force, it doesn’t mean that individual person also has those traits, or has anything to do with them, now or at any time. Expecting it of them is insulting (not to mention highly bigoted), and it’s about as ridiculous as going to Spain and holding any random individual Spaniard responsible for the actions of the conquistadores. They weren’t there, they probably aren’t related, and the fact that they share inborn traits is a ridiculous attempt to affiliate them…exactly as ludicrous as, say, judging people who have dark or light skin to be all alike…or those of a certain gender…hmm, I’m seeing a trend here.

Without the support of people outside of our social label groups, we may not be able to achieve great things. I know that without the support of open-minded heterosexuals, a trait I’m identified by — homosexual — would still be treated as even more second-class citizens than we are. It would be stupid and insulting for me to assume that any heterosexual was just a ticking time bomb to a hate crime, just because there have been homophobic avowed heterosexuals responsible for hate crimes. In a similar way, it would be unacceptable for me to ask any random heterosexual I know — judging them solely by that single trait — to apologise for these crimes, as if they have something to do with them because of their own inborn social label they did not ask for and can’t help; how stupid would that be?

So before you presume anything about someone just because of a social label or two that they were born with, think about whether or not it is justified (hint: it isn’t) or whether it just makes you look like a huge bigoted hypocrite. And tossing political terms seemingly at random into your racist and sexist diatribe only further cheapens your message. Inborn traits and social labels, with very few exceptions, do not make an individual person by default better or worse in any job, task, or other role, and in any case none of these have much of anything to do with arbitrary application of political labels.

I’m just an ageing hippie, but I try to give people neutral respect when I meet them. I’m civil and cordial, but until they prove by their actions and words, one way or another, I don’t esteem them or hold contempt for them. And unlike some people, I accept the possibility that, shock of shocks, I can be wrong.

We are all individuals. We are all mingled in race and tribe and people. All we ultimately have, above all other things that we accumulate in life, is ourselves, our minds, our spirits, the things that make up who we are. And that is what people should be assessed by, not by some presumption of privilege, oppression, ignorance, enlightenment, connection, insularity, innocence, or guilt connected to the arbitrary application of things we were born with, or history connected to us with which we had no real affiliation.

I hope perhaps this will reach some people. I wish I hadn’t had to say it again.

Tags: rant equality tolerance discrimination bigotry
19 notes